z-logo
Premium
Cl‐atom transfer from CFCl 3 to the c ‐C 6 H 11 radical. An indirect estimation of the CFCl 2 Cl bond dissociation energy
Author(s) -
Baruch G.,
Rajbenbach L. A.,
Horowitz A.
Publication year - 1981
Publication title -
international journal of chemical kinetics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.341
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 1097-4601
pISSN - 0538-8066
DOI - 10.1002/kin.550130505
Subject(s) - chemistry , arrhenius equation , radical , reactivity (psychology) , cyclohexane , dissociation (chemistry) , activation energy , bond dissociation energy , reaction rate constant , photochemistry , kinetics , organic chemistry , medicine , alternative medicine , physics , pathology , quantum mechanics
The Cl‐transfer reaction between CFCl 3 and c ‐C 6 H 11 radicals (R) was studied in liquid cyclohexane (RH). The Arrhenius parameters for Cl abstraction were determined in the RH‐CFCl 3 system versus the termination reaction between cyclohexyl radicals and competitively versus addition to C 2 Cl 4 in the RH‐CFCl 3 ‐C 2 Cl 4 system. The two sets of results are in very good agreement and give the following Arrhenius expression for the reaction R + CFCL 3 → RCl + CFCl 2 (2):\documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$$ \log {\rm }k_2 (1/{\rm mol\, sec}) = 8.95 - 7.79/\theta $$\end{document}where θ = 2.303 RT in kcal/mol. Comparison with Cl‐transfer data of other chloromethanes and chloroethanes shows that an increase in the CCl bond dissociation energy is the main cause of the reduced reactivity of CFCl 3 . Based on a previously developed correlation, D (CFCl 2 Cl) is estimated to be equal to 74.4 kcal/mol.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom