z-logo
Premium
The SO 2 ( 3 B 1 ) photosensitized isomerization of cis ‐ and trans ‐1,2‐dichloroethylene
Author(s) -
Wampler Fred B.,
Böttenheim Jan W.
Publication year - 1976
Publication title -
international journal of chemical kinetics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.341
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 1097-4601
pISSN - 0538-8066
DOI - 10.1002/kin.550080412
Subject(s) - chemistry , isomerization , quantum yield , reaction rate constant , yield (engineering) , quenching (fluorescence) , cis–trans isomerism , photostationary state , excited state , molecule , photochemistry , photodissociation , analytical chemistry (journal) , fluorescence , stereochemistry , photoisomerization , kinetics , atomic physics , organic chemistry , physics , catalysis , quantum mechanics , thermodynamics
The photolysis of SO 2 at 3712 Å in the presence of the 1,2‐dichloroethylenes has been investigated at 22deg;C. The data are consistent with the SO 2 ( 3 B 1 ) photosensitized isomerization of the 1,2‐dichloroethylene isomer. A kinetic treatment of the initial quantum yield data was consistent with the formation of a polarized charge‐transfer intermediate whenever SO 2 ( 3 B 1 ) molecules and one of the 1,2‐dichloroethylene isomers collide which ultimately decays unimolecularly to the cis ‐isomer with a probability of 0.70 ± 0.26 and to the trans ‐isomer with a 0.37 ± 0.16 probability. Quenching rate constants for removal of SO 2 ( 3 B 1 ) molecules by cis ‐ and trans ‐1,2‐dichloroethylene have been estimated from quantum yield data and from laser excited phosphorescence lifetimes using an excitation wavelength of 3130 Å. Estimates of the quenching rate constant (units of 1./mole ± sec) are for the cis ‐isomer, (1.63 ± 0.71) × 10 10 , quantum yield data, and (2.44 ± 0.11) × 10 10 , lifetime data; and for the trans ‐isomer,(2.59 ± 0.09)×10 10 , lifetime data, and (2.35 ±0.89) × 10 10 , quantum yield data. An experimentally determined photostationary composition,[ cis ‐C 2 Cl 2 H 2 ]/[ trans ‐C 2 Cl 2 H 2 ] = 1.8 ‐ 0.1, was in good agreement with a value of 2.00 ‐ 1.15 which was predicted from rate constants derived in this study.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here