Premium
How much is the accuracy of activation energy affected by ignoring thermal inertia?
Author(s) -
Vyazovkin Sergey
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
international journal of chemical kinetics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.341
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 1097-4601
pISSN - 0538-8066
DOI - 10.1002/kin.21326
Subject(s) - differential scanning calorimetry , activation energy , chemistry , crystallization , calorimeter (particle physics) , copper , thermodynamics , thermal , work (physics) , polystyrene , thermal inertia , analytical chemistry (journal) , calorimetry , chromatography , polymer , organic chemistry , physics , detector , electrical engineering , engineering
This work estimates the magnitude of the effect of thermal inertia on the value of the activation energy determined from heat‐flux differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) data. The estimates are obtained via analysis of the literature data on crystallization of copper and thermal degradation of isotactic polystyrene (iPS). The copper crystallization data have been obtained for very large masses (200 mg) and fast heating rates up to 80 K min −1 . The iPS degradation data have been collected on small masses (3 mg) and at the heating rates up to 20 K min −1 . For crystallization of copper, the Kissinger activation energy obtained from the DSC data corrected for thermal inertia is 34% larger than the value estimated from uncorrected data. This difference drops to 8% and becomes statistically insignificant when the fastest heating rate used is decreased to 10 K min −1 . For iPS degradation, the difference in the isoconversional activation energies estimated, respectively, from corrected and uncorrected DSC data is less than 3% and is not statistically significant. Overall, the effect of thermal inertia on the activation energy appears negligible provided that DSC measurements are conducted on smaller samples and at slower heating rates, that is, as advised by the International Confederation for Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry (ICTAC) recommendations. It is suggested that the difference in the activation energies should generally be within the typical 5‐10% uncertainty as long as the product of the time constant and the maximum heating rate does not exceed 2‐3 K.