Premium
Computational Fluid Dynamic Design of Jet Stirred Reactors for Measuring Intrinsic Kinetics of Gas‐Phase and Gas‐Solid Reactions
Author(s) -
Reyniers Pieter A.,
Sarris Stamatis A.,
Marin Guy B.,
Van Geem Kevin M.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
international journal of chemical kinetics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.341
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 1097-4601
pISSN - 0538-8066
DOI - 10.1002/kin.21016
Subject(s) - chemistry , jet (fluid) , mass transfer , residence time distribution , thermodynamics , residence time (fluid dynamics) , kinetics , mixing (physics) , heat transfer , chemical kinetics , mechanics , computational fluid dynamics , chromatography , mineralogy , inclusion (mineral) , physics , quantum mechanics , engineering , geotechnical engineering
Nonreactive and reactive computational fluid dynamic simulations were applied to optimize the design of a laboratory scale jet stirred reactor for measuring intrinsic kinetics of gas‐phase and gas‐solid reactions, i.e. kinetics determined by chemical steps only and not by heat or mass transfer. In the past these reactors were designed and tested based on empirical design criteria and residence time distribution experiments. This work shows that these do not always capture important local effects that are vital for kinetic studies. First the degree of macro–mixing was evaluated for three different geometries (down case, 45° case and 90° case) by performing in silico residence time distribution experiments at 900 K, showing that with these type of experiments only minor differences are observed. However, the ethane steam cracking simulations revealed major differences, with the 45° case being the most uniform in terms of temperature and the 90° case being by far the worst. The species nonuniformity in all geometries was acceptable and was in some cases even partly masked by important shortcut streams such as those observed in the 90° case. The existing gradients on the substrate surface are sufficiently small to be neglected in modeling efforts. As temperature is the major parameter determining the rate of the surface reactions, the 45° case is suggested as the best geometry for measuring intrinsic kinetics.