Premium
Rate constants for H + CH 4 , CH 3 + H 2 , and CH 4 dissociation at high temperature
Author(s) -
Sutherland J. W.,
Su M.C.,
Michael J. V.
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
international journal of chemical kinetics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.341
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 1097-4601
pISSN - 0538-8066
DOI - 10.1002/kin.1064
Subject(s) - chemistry , reaction rate constant , dissociation (chemistry) , atmospheric temperature range , shock tube , bond dissociation energy , thermal decomposition , analytical chemistry (journal) , photodissociation , hydrogen atom , radical , atomic physics , thermodynamics , shock wave , kinetics , photochemistry , physics , organic chemistry , alkyl , quantum mechanics
The Laser Photolysis‐Shock Tube technique coupled with H‐atom atomic resonance absorption spectrometry has been used to study the reaction, H + CH 4 → CH 3 + H 2 , over the temperature range, 928–1697 K. Shock‐tube studies on the reverse of this reaction, CH 3 + H 2 → H + CH 4 , using CH 3 I dissociation in the presence of H 2 yielded H‐atom formation rates and rate constants for the reverse process over the temperature range, 1269–1806 K. These results were transformed (using well‐established equilibrium constants) to the forward direction. The combined results for H + CH 4 can be represented by an experimental three parameter expression, k = 6.78 × 10 −21 T 3.156 exp(−4406 K/T) cm 3 molecule −1 s −1 (348–1950 K) that was evaluated from the present work and seven previous studies. Using this evaluation, disagreements between previously reported values for the dissociation of CH 4 could be reconciled. The thermal decomposition of CH 4 was then studied in Kr bath gas. The dissociation results agreed with the earlier studies and were theoretically modeled with the Troe formalism. The energy transfer parameter necessary to explain both the present results and those of Kiefer and Kumaran (J Phys Chem 1993, 97, 414) is, −〈ΔE〉 all /cm −1 = 0.3323 T 0.7 . The low temperature data on the reverse reaction, H + CH 3 (in He) from Brouard et al. (J Phys Chem 1989, 93, 4047) were also modeled with the Troe formalism. Lastly, the rate constant for H + CH 4 was theoretically calculated using conventional transition state theory with Eckart tunneling corrections. The potential energy surface used was from Kraka et al. (J Chem Phys 1993, 99, 5306) and the derived T‐dependence with this method agreed almost perfectly with the experimental evaluation. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Int J Chem Kinet 33: 669–684, 2001