Premium
Precommercial forest thinning alters abundance but not survival of snowshoe hares
Author(s) -
Abele Susan L.,
Wirsing Aaron J.,
Murray Dennis L.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
the journal of wildlife management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.94
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1937-2817
pISSN - 0022-541X
DOI - 10.1002/jwmg.426
Subject(s) - thinning , abundance (ecology) , ecology , habitat , wildlife , biodiversity , ecosystem , disturbance (geology) , snowshoe hare , geography , population , biology , demography , paleontology , sociology
Abstract Anthropogenic landscape modification is a major threat to global biodiversity and ecosystem integrity. Thus, land use practices that reconcile human needs with protection of species and ecological processes are of interest. Precommercial forest thinning (PCT) is a land use practice that is believed to be less ecologically disruptive than other silvicultural approaches (e.g., clear‐cutting). The impacts of PCT on wildlife populations are not well understood, however, and the effects of this practice on individual animals have not been rigorously examined. Accordingly, we investigated short‐term population and individual responses of snowshoe hares ( Lepus americanus ) to PCT in western Oregon during 2001–2002. We live‐trapped hares ( n = 143) seasonally and equipped them with mortality‐sensitive radio‐collars on 3 manipulated sites that were precommercially thinned and on 3 undisturbed controls. We also quantified the activity (movement rates) of all collared hares using an automated data‐logger. As a result, we were able to document the effects of PCT on hare abundance, individual survival, and daily movement. Thinning significantly reduced hare abundance relative to that on control sites, but had no effect on individual mortality or activity. We infer, therefore, that a portion of the hares on thinned sites dispersed to adjacent habitat, where they survived as well as conspecifics on both control and manipulated sites but were unavailable for subsequent capture. We conclude that PCT affects hare density in the short‐term (i.e., at least in the first few years post‐treatment) largely via altered behavior. Thus, if the immediate impacts of this practice on hare populations are to be minimized, thinned stands should be imbedded in a habitat matrix that facilitates the occupancy of individuals dispersing from disturbed patches. © 2012 The Wildlife Society.