Premium
Avian Predation on Steelhead is Consistent with Compensatory Mortality
Author(s) -
Haeseker Steven L.,
Scheer Gabriel,
McCann Jerry
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
the journal of wildlife management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.94
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1937-2817
pISSN - 0022-541X
DOI - 10.1002/jwmg.21880
Subject(s) - predation , biology , juvenile , ecology , estuary , fishery , alewife , trout , tern , fish <actinopterygii>
Numerous factors such as predation, disease, injury, and environmental conditions (e.g., river flows, hydropower operations) can influence survival rates of fish. Although mortality due to predation is commonly assumed to be additive and result in a directly proportional reduction on survival rates, compensatory processes may work to counteract or negate the effects of predation mortality on survival rates. We applied a random effects model to a long‐term, mark‐recapture‐recovery data set on anadromous steelhead ( Oncorhynchus mykiss ) from the Snake River Basin in the northwestern United States to assess whether avian predation mortality constitutes an additive or compensatory source of mortality. Specifically, our assessment focused on predation mortality due to double‐crested cormorants ( Phalacrocorax auritus ) and Caspian terns ( Hydroprogne caspia ) on colonies in the Columbia River estuary. In addition, we evaluated several candidate environmental indices to examine potential interactions between the effects of predation versus environmental conditions on steelhead survival rates. Average predation rates were 3.3% for the double‐crested cormorant colony and 17.0% for the Caspian tern colony. For both colonies, the estimated correlation between the predation rate and survival rate of steelhead was near zero, indicating that mortality due to avian predation is compensatory. Models that included variables for river flow, juvenile migration timing, and an index of forage biomass in the ocean accounted for 56–59% of the variation in steelhead survival, whereas avian predation rates accounted for <1% of the variation. Management efforts to reduce the abundance of the bird colonies are unlikely to improve the survival or conservation status of steelhead; however, results indicate that steelhead survival could be improved by hydropower management decisions that increase river flows and reduce juvenile migration delays. © 2020 The Wildlife Society.