Premium
Short‐term effect of helicopter‐based capture on movements of a social ungulate
Author(s) -
Jung Thomas S.,
Konkolics Sean M.,
Kukka Piia M.,
Majchrzak Yasmine N.,
Menzies Allyson K.,
Oakley Michelle P.,
Peers Michael J.L.,
Studd Emily K.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
the journal of wildlife management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.94
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1937-2817
pISSN - 0022-541X
DOI - 10.1002/jwmg.21640
Subject(s) - ungulate , wildlife , demography , movement (music) , bison bison , motion capture , home range , geography , ecology , biology , habitat , computer science , motion (physics) , artificial intelligence , philosophy , sociology , aesthetics
Capture and handling of wildlife is often an important component of studies where detailed demographic, behavioral, physiological, or health data are required. Yet, capturing and handling wildlife is sometimes controversial and lacking public support because of concern about effects on individuals. Investigating potential effects of capturing wildlife is also important to inform data‐censoring protocols when using information obtained from captured animals. We investigated the short‐term effect of helicopter‐based capture and handling on movements of free‐ranging bison ( Bison bison ) that were chemically immobilized in Yukon, Canada. We examined daily movement rates, home range size, and displacement of global positioning system‐collared individuals immediately after capture and for 20 days thereafter. Our results indicate that there is a minimal short‐term effect of helicopter‐based capture on bison movements. Significant differences from apparent pre‐capture movement behavior were observed only within 24 hours after capture. We observed variation among individuals, however, with some animals taking up to 10 days to return to apparent pre‐capture movement rates, whereas others had no measurable response to capture. Despite individual variation, >80% of individuals had returned to apparent pre‐capture movement behavior within the first 5 days after capture. Furthermore, sex‐based effects were evident: females increased their daily movement rates, home range size, and displacement after capture, whereas males had either no effect or decreased movement rates. Our results suggest that movement rates are altered for only a short period after capture and, therefore, should not have severe negative effects on bison using our protocols. Accordingly, researchers should censor the first 10 days after capture from their analyses to avoid using biased information. Our study should also help inform public discourse regarding capturing and handling wildlife for research or management purposes. © 2019 The Wildlife Society