Premium
Identifying holes in the greater sage‐grouse conservation umbrella
Author(s) -
Carlisle Jason D.,
Keinath Douglas A.,
Albeke Shan E.,
Chalfoun Anna D.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
the journal of wildlife management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.94
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1937-2817
pISSN - 0022-541X
DOI - 10.1002/jwmg.21460
Subject(s) - nature reserve , habitat , ecology , umbrella species , geography , game reserve , protected area , population , vegetation (pathology) , biology , endangered species , wildlife , demography , medicine , pathology , sociology
ABSTRACT The umbrella species concept, wherein multiple species are indirectly protected under the umbrella of a reserve created for one, is intended to enhance conservation efficiency. Although appealing in theory and common in practice, empirical tests of the concept have been scarce. We used a real‐world, semi‐protected reserve established to protect a high‐profile umbrella species (greater sage‐grouse [ Centrocercus urophasianus ]) to investigate 2 potential mechanisms underlying the concept's successful application: reserve size and species similarity. We estimated how much habitat protection the established reserve provided to 52 species of conservation concern associated with vegetation communities where greater sage‐grouse occur. To illustrate the importance of reserve size, we compared the effectiveness of the established reserve to alternative greater sage‐grouse reserves of various sizes and to simulated reserves of equal size but sited with no regard for greater sage‐grouse. We further assessed whether key species’ traits were associated with different levels of protection under the umbrella reserve. The established umbrella reserve protected 82% of the state's greater sage‐grouse population and 0–63% of the habitat of the background species examined. The reserve outperformed equally sized, simulated reserves for only 12 of 52 background species. As expected, larger alternative reserves served as better umbrellas, but regardless of reserve size, not all species received equal protection. The established reserve was most effective at protecting the habitat of species that were most similar to the umbrella species (i.e., avian species, those highly associated with sagebrush plant communities, and those with widespread habitat). In contrast, the habitat of species with restricted distributions, particularly when combined with vegetation associations not closely matching the umbrella species, was not protected as well by the umbrella reserve. Such species require additional, targeted attention to achieve conservation objectives. Successful application of the umbrella species concept requires careful consideration of the characteristics of the umbrella species, the reserve delineated on its behalf, and the similarity of the umbrella species to its purported background species. © 2018 The Wildlife Society.