Premium
Effect of mast production on home range use of Japanese black bears
Author(s) -
Kozakai Chinatsu,
Yamazaki Koji,
Nemoto Yui,
Nakajima Ami,
Koike Shinsuke,
Abe Shin,
Masaki Takashi,
Kaji Koichi
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
the journal of wildlife management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.94
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1937-2817
pISSN - 0022-541X
DOI - 10.1002/jwmg.122
Subject(s) - mast (botany) , fagaceae , home range , habitat , geography , ursus , ecology , biology , demography , mast cell , population , sociology , immunology
Although bears may expand their home ranges in times of low food availability, it is unclear what mechanisms directly affect home range extension in times of low mast production in Japanese forests. To clarify the relationship between home range utilization by Japanese black bears ( Ursus thibetanus ) and abundance and distribution of mast production, we collected data on habitat use from 13 bears (6 M and 7 F) fitted with Global Positioning System (GPS) collars equipped with activity sensors in the Ashio‐Nikko Mountains on the eastern part of Honshu Island, Japan, during 2006–2008. We also collected data on mast production by 5 Fagaceae species. We categorized each fall as either poor (2006) or relatively‐good (2007 and 2008) based on mast production. Bears used small patches in their large home ranges and the distances between core areas increased in the fall of 2006, when the mast of Japanese oak ( Quercus crispula ) were poorly distributed. Our findings suggest that localized patches of Japanese oak are the staple food for bears in our study area, even in poor mast years. However, in the fall of 2006, we also found that bears moved to lower elevations, relative to 2007 and 2008, in search of alternative foods (e.g., Konara oak [ Q . serrata ] and Japanese chestnut [ Castanea crenata ]), which were mostly at lower elevations and produced mast consistently over the study period. Our results suggest that dispersion and elevational distribution of mast‐producing trees affect bear habitat use in fall, as well as amount of mast. © 2011 The Wildlife Society.