z-logo
Premium
Effect of Treatment Sequencing on the Tumor Response to Combined Treatment With Ultrasound‐Stimulated Microbubbles and Radiotherapy
Author(s) -
Klein Jonathan,
Tran William,
Lai Priscilla,
AlMahrouki Azza,
Giles Anoja,
Czarnota Gregory J.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of ultrasound in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.574
H-Index - 91
eISSN - 1550-9613
pISSN - 0278-4297
DOI - 10.1002/jum.15363
Subject(s) - medicine , h&e stain , microbubbles , staining , cd31 , radiation therapy , terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase , tunel assay , prostate cancer , urology , pathology , ultrasound , nuclear medicine , cancer , immunohistochemistry , radiology
Objectives To investigate whether timing and sequencing of ultrasound‐stimulated microbubbles (USMBs) and external beam radiotherapy (XRT) affect the treatment response in a preclinical prostate cancer model. Methods Prostate cancer xenografts were treated with ultrasound‐stimulated lipid microspheres before and after 8‐Gy XRT. Treatments were separated by 0, 3, 6, 12, and 24 hours, with 5 tumors per group. Tumor effects were evaluated by microvessel density (measured by CD31 staining), cell death (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase deoxyuridine triphosphate nick end‐labeling and hematoxylin–eosin staining), and hypoxia (carbonic anhydrase 9 staining). Results Administering USMBs 6 hours before XRT showed the maximum treatment effect using all 3 assays. At this time, the mean cell death index ± SD was 36% ± 10%, compared with 19% ± 4% for no separation between USMB treatment and XRT; the microvessel density was 9 ± 3 counts per field (19 ± 5 without separation); and the percentage of hypoxic cells was 10% ± 5% (21% ± 4%). The observed treatment effect was greater with USMBs before XRT than when administering XRT first, but these differences were not statistically significant. Conclusions The maximum tumor effect was observed with USMBs delivered 6 hours before XRT. The sequencing of treatment did not have a significant effect on the tumor response.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here