Premium
Preoperative Tumor Staging of Gastric Cancer: Comparison of Double Contrast‐Enhanced Ultrasound and Multidetector Computed Tomography
Author(s) -
He Ping,
Miao Liying,
Ge Huiyu,
Wang Tianli,
Ye Juxiang,
Meng Lingmei,
Xue Heng,
Zhang Fan,
Zhao Bo
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of ultrasound in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.574
H-Index - 91
eISSN - 1550-9613
pISSN - 0278-4297
DOI - 10.1002/jum.15028
Subject(s) - medicine , multidetector computed tomography , computed tomography , radiology , ultrasound , cancer , contrast (vision) , nuclear medicine , contrast enhanced ultrasound , cancer staging , artificial intelligence , computer science
Objectives The purpose of this study was to compare the sensitivity and specificity of double contrast‐enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in the preoperative tumor staging of gastric cancer (GC) to stratify patients for suitable treatment. Methods Fifty‐four patients with GC proved by histologic findings were included. The sensitivity and specificity of double CEUS and MDCT for tumor staging were calculated and compared. The differences between these methods were evaluated by using the area under the curve (AUC) from a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Results There were no significant differences in AUC values for T1 and T2 stages between double CEUS and MDCT ( P = .190 and .256, respectively). However, the sensitivity of double CEUS in the detection of the T1 stage was higher than that of MDCT (88% versus 75%). The AUC values of MDCT for T3 and T4 stages were 0.833 and 0.905, which were both significantly higher than those of double CEUS (0.759 and 0.696; P < .05). The sensitivities of double CEUS and MDCT for the T3 stage were both 89%, but the accuracy and specificity of double CEUS were lower than those of MDCT (76% versus 83% and 63% versus 78%). The specificities of double CEUS and MDCT for the T4 stage were both 98%, but the accuracy and sensitivity of double CEUS were lower than those of MDCT (85% versus 94% and 42% versus 83%). Conclusions Multidetector CT is superior to double CEUS for T3 and T4 GC, and double CEUS may be regarded as an important complementary method to MDCT.