Premium
Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Zone II Partial Flexor Tendon Lacerations of the Fingers: A Cadaveric Study
Author(s) -
Kazmers Nikolas H.,
Gordon Joshua A.,
Buterbaugh Kristen L.,
Bozentka David J.,
Steinberg David R.,
Khoury Viviane
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
journal of ultrasound in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.574
H-Index - 91
eISSN - 1550-9613
pISSN - 0278-4297
DOI - 10.1002/jum.14435
Subject(s) - medicine , cadaveric spasm , confidence interval , tendon , elbow , ultrasound , surgery , ultrasonography , cadaver , nuclear medicine , anatomy , radiology
Objectives Accurate assessment of zone II partial flexor tendon lacerations in the finger is clinically important. Surgical repair is recommended for lacerations of greater than 50% to 60%. Our goal was to evaluate ultrasonographic test characteristics and accuracy in identifying partial flexor tendon lacerations in a cadaveric model. Methods From fresh‐frozen above‐elbow human cadaveric specimens, 32 flexor digitorum profundus tendons were randomly selected to remain intact or receive low‐ or high‐grade lacerations involving 10% to 40% and 60% to 90% of the radioulnar width within Verdan Zone II, respectively. Static and dynamic ultrasonography using a linear array 14‐MHz transducer was performed by a blinded musculoskeletal radiologist. Sensitivities, specificities, and other standard test performance metrics were calculated. Actual and measured percentages of tendon laceration were compared by the paired t test. Results After randomization, 24 tendons were lacerated (12 low‐ and 12 high‐grade), whereas 8 remained intact. The sensitivity and specificity in detecting the presence versus absence of a partial laceration were 0.54 and 0.75, respectively, with positive and negative likelihood ratio values of 2.17 and 0.61. For low‐grade lacerations, the sensitivity and specificity were 0.25 and 0.85, compared to 0.83 and 0.85 for high‐grade lacerations. Ultrasonography underestimated the percentage of tendon involvement by a mean of 18.1% for the study population as a whole (95% confidence interval, 9.0% to 27.2%; P < .001) but accurately determined the extent for correctly diagnosed high‐grade lacerations (–6.7%; 95% confidence interval, –18.7% to 5.2%; P = .22). Conclusions Ultrasonography was useful in identifying and characterizing clinically relevant high‐grade zone II partial flexor digitorum profundus lacerations in a cadaveric model.