Premium
Overview of research addressing ethical dimensions of participation in traumatic stress studies: Autonomy and beneficence
Author(s) -
Newman Elana,
Kaloupek Danny
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
journal of traumatic stress
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.259
H-Index - 134
eISSN - 1573-6598
pISSN - 0894-9867
DOI - 10.1002/jts.20465
Subject(s) - beneficence , autonomy , engineering ethics , element (criminal law) , psychology , traumatic stress , human factors and ergonomics , informed consent , poison control , medicine , political science , clinical psychology , alternative medicine , law , engineering , medical emergency , pathology
One element of the design of human research studies is ethically informed decision‐making. Key issues include the safety, costs, and benefits of participation. Historically, much of this decision‐making was based on opinion rather than formal evidence. Recently, however, investigators in the traumatic stress field have begun to collect data that are relevant to these decisions. In this article, the authors focus on issues emanating from the ethical concepts of autonomy and respect for persons and beneficence and nonmaleficence, and then summarize relevant evidence from studies with trauma‐exposed individuals. Discussion addresses implications of this evidence for research practice and policy, and identifies some potentially informative data collections opportunities for future trauma studies.