z-logo
Premium
The rocks and hard places in psychotherapy outcome research
Author(s) -
Schnurr Paula P.
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
journal of traumatic stress
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.259
H-Index - 134
eISSN - 1573-6598
pISSN - 0894-9867
DOI - 10.1002/jts.20292
Subject(s) - psychotherapist , psychology , relevance (law) , psychological intervention , traumatic stress , clinical psychology , posttraumatic stress , randomized controlled trial , psychiatry , medicine , political science , law , surgery
The field of traumatic stress has experienced significant growth in the number of psychotherapy treatment studies conducted, especially in the past 10 years. In this article, the author aims to help both the readers of this work and psychotherapy researchers by reviewing key concepts in trial design and discussing issues unique to psychotherapy (and other nonpharmacological interventions). The discussion is broad and nontechnical, particularly with respect to statistical issues. The focus is on between‐group randomized designs, and on outcome rather than process. Examples are drawn from posttraumatic stress disorder treatment studies to enhance relevance to the field of traumatic stress.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here