Premium
Determination of multiple pesticide residues in teas by gas chromatography with accurate time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry
Author(s) -
Li Jianxun,
Teng Xiaoyu,
Wang Wenwen,
Zhang Zijuan,
Fan Chunlin
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of separation science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.72
H-Index - 102
eISSN - 1615-9314
pISSN - 1615-9306
DOI - 10.1002/jssc.201800975
Subject(s) - chemistry , mass spectrometry , chromatography , electron ionization , gas chromatography , detection limit , time of flight mass spectrometry , analytical chemistry (journal) , tandem mass spectrometry , analyte , pesticide residue , direct electron ionization liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry interface , mass , mass spectrum , chemical ionization , ionization , pesticide , ion , organic chemistry , agronomy , biology
Abstract In this work, gas chromatography tandem with electron ionization and full‐scan high‐resolution mass spectrometry with a time‐of‐flight mass analyzer was evaluated for analyzing pesticide residues in teas. The relevant aspects for mass spectrometry analysis, including the resolution and mass accuracy, acquisition rate, temperature of ion source, were investigated. Under acquisition condition in 2‐GHz extended dynamic range mode, accurate mass spectral library including 184 gas chromatography detectable pesticides was established and retrieval parameters were optimized. The mass spectra were consistent over a wide concentration range (three orders) with good match values to those of NIST (EI‐quadrupole). The methodology was verified by the validation of 184 pesticides in four tea matrices. A wide linear range (1–1000 μg/kg) was obtained for most compounds in four matrices. Limit of detection, limit of quantification, and limit of identification values acquired in this study could satisfy the requirements for maximum residue levels prescribed by the European Community. Recovery studies were performed at three concentrations (10, 50, and 100 μg/kg). Most of the analytes were recovered at an acceptable range of 70–120% with relative standard deviations ≤ 20% in four matrices. The potential extension of qualitative screening scope makes gas chromatography tandem with electron ionization and mass spectrometry with a time‐of‐flight mass analyzer a more powerful tool compared with gas chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry.