z-logo
Premium
Determination of cannabinoids from a surrogate hops matrix using multiple reaction monitoring gas chromatography with triple quadrupole mass spectrometry
Author(s) -
Leghissa Allegra,
Hildenbrand Zacariah L.,
Foss Frank W.,
Schug Kevin A.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
journal of separation science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.72
H-Index - 102
eISSN - 1615-9314
pISSN - 1615-9306
DOI - 10.1002/jssc.201700946
Subject(s) - chemistry , chromatography , mass spectrometry , gas chromatography–mass spectrometry , triple quadrupole mass spectrometer , selected reaction monitoring , gas chromatography , silylation , matrix (chemical analysis) , decarboxylation , tandem mass spectrometry , organic chemistry , catalysis
Cannabinoids are the primary bioactive constituents of Cannabis sativa and Cannabis indica plants. In this work, gas chromatography in conjunction with triple quadrupole mass spectrometry in multiple reaction monitoring mode was explored for determination of cannabinoids from a surrogate hops matrix. Gas chromatography with mass spectrometry is a reasonable choice for the analysis of these compounds; however, such methods are susceptible to false positives for Δ9‐tetrahydrocannabinol, due to decarboxylation of Δ9‐tetrahydrocannabinolic acid, its acid precursor, in the hot injection port. To avoid this transformation, the carboxyl group of Δ9‐tetrahydrocannabinolic acid was protected through a silylation reaction. Multiple reaction monitoring transitions for both unmodified and silylated cannabinoids were developed and the fragmentation pathways for the different species were assigned. Precision and accuracy were evaluated for cannabinoids spiked into hops at different levels. The developed methods provided good linearity ( R 2  > 0.99) for all the cannabinoids with a linear range from 0.15 to 20 mg/L, and with limits of detection in the orders of low‐ to mid‐picogram on column. The recoveries for the cannabinoids were generally between 75 and 120%. Precisions (<6% coefficient of variation) were within acceptable ranges.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here