Premium
Analysis of therapeutic proteins and peptides using multiangle light scattering coupled to ultra high performance liquid chromatography
Author(s) -
Espinosade la Garza Carlos E.,
MirandaHernández Mariana P.,
AcostaFlores Lilia,
Pérez Néstor O.,
FloresOrtiz Luis F.,
MedinaRivero Emilio
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
journal of separation science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.72
H-Index - 102
eISSN - 1615-9314
pISSN - 1615-9306
DOI - 10.1002/jssc.201400863
Subject(s) - molar mass , dispersity , chemistry , chromatography , size exclusion chromatography , mass spectrometry , multiangle light scattering , high performance liquid chromatography , refractometry , analytical chemistry (journal) , light scattering , refractive index , scattering , materials science , polymer , organic chemistry , physics , optoelectronics , optics , enzyme
Analysis of the physical properties of biotherapeutic proteins is crucial throughout all the stages of their lifecycle. Herein, we used size‐exclusion ultra high performance liquid chromatography coupled to multiangle light scattering and refractive index detection systems to determine the molar mass, mass‐average molar mass, molar‐mass dispersity and hydrodynamic radius of two monoclonal antibodies (rituximab and trastuzumab), a fusion protein (etanercept), and a synthetic copolymer (glatiramer acetate) employed as models. A customized instrument configuration was set to diminish band‐broadening effects and enhance sensitivity throughout detectors. The customized configuration showed a performance improvement with respect to the high‐performance liquid chromatography standard configuration, as observed by a 3 h column conditioning and a higher resolution analysis in 20 min. Analysis of the two monoclonal antibodies showed averaged values of 148.0 kDa for mass‐average molar mass and 5.4 nm for hydrodynamic radius, whereas for etanercept these values were 124.2 kDa and 6.9 nm, respectively. Molar‐mass dispersity was 1.000 on average for these proteins. Regarding glatiramer acetate, a molar mass range from 3 to 45 kDa and a molar‐mass dispersity of 1.304 were consistent with its intrinsic peptide diversity, and its mass‐average molar mass was 10.4 kDa. Overall, this method demonstrated an accurate determination of molar mass, overcoming the difficulties of size‐exclusion chromatography.