Premium
A liquid chromatographic method optimization for the assessment of low and high molar mass carbonyl compounds in wines
Author(s) -
de Azevedo Luciana C.,
Reis Marina M.,
Pereira Giuliano E.,
da Rocha Gisele O.,
Silva Luciana A.,
de Andrade Jailson B.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
journal of separation science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.72
H-Index - 102
eISSN - 1615-9314
pISSN - 1615-9306
DOI - 10.1002/jssc.200900281
Subject(s) - chromatography , chemistry , molar mass , molar , organic chemistry , polymer , medicine , dentistry
Carbonyl compounds (CC) play an important role in beverage aroma since they may affect flavor of wines, brandies, and beers, among others. For this reason, it is necessary to identify and quantify CC through adequate analytical techniques. This study is a proposal of both developing and optimization of a new analytical methodology that allows investigate C 1 –C 8 CC in wines simultaneously by quantifying even those ones that are predominantly present in the adduct form hydroxylalkylsulfonic acids (HASA). The HASA dissociation is undertaken by specific alkaline media (pH 11). The developed methodology employed the LC with UV/VIS detection (λ = 365 nm) technique under gradient elution in the way to reach both free‐CC and bound‐CC quantification. Results showed that binary gradient system using eluent A (MeOH/ACN/H 2 O 74.5:0.5:25% v/v/v) and eluent B (MeOH) reached the best separation condition of both lower and higher molecular mass CC. This proposed method allowed simultaneous quantification of formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, propanone, furfuraldehyde, butyraldehyde, benzaldehyde, hexanaldehyde, 2‐ethyl‐hexanaldehyde, E‐pent‐2‐en‐1‐al, and cyclohexanone – all of them were found in white wine ( Moscato Canelli ) and red wine ( Shiraz ) produced in the São Francisco Valley, in the Northeastern Region of Brazil – although this optimized method may probably be suitable for quantification of propionaldehyde, isobutyraldehyde, heptanaldehyde, octanaldehyde, benzaldehyde, and E‐hex‐2‐en‐1‐al as well. We could not prove if this method is also able to determine the latter CC group since we have not found these substances present in detectable levels in our real samples considered in this study.