Premium
Characterization of volatile substances in apples from Rosaceae family by headspace solid‐phase microextraction followed by GC‐qMS
Author(s) -
Ferreira Liseth,
Perestrelo Rosa,
Caldeira Michael,
Câmara José S.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
journal of separation science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.72
H-Index - 102
eISSN - 1615-9314
pISSN - 1615-9306
DOI - 10.1002/jssc.200900024
Subject(s) - chemistry , solid phase microextraction , chromatography , gas chromatography , aroma , malus , gas chromatography–mass spectrometry , extraction (chemistry) , sample preparation , mass spectrometry , botany , food science , biology
The volatile composition of different apple varieties of Malus domestica Borkh. species from different geographic regions at Madeira Islands, namely Ponta do Pargo (PP), Porto Santo (PS), and Santo da Serra (SS) was established by headspace solid‐phase microextraction (HS‐SPME) procedure followed by GC‐MS (GC‐qMS) analysis. Significant parameters affecting sorption process such as fiber coating, extraction temperature, extraction time, sample amount, dilution factor, ionic strength, and desorption time, were optimized and discussed. The SPME fiber coated with 50/30 μm divinylbenzene/carboxen/PDMS (DVB/CAR/PDMS) afforded highest extraction efficiency of volatile compounds, providing the best sensitivity for the target volatiles, particularly when the samples were extracted at 50°C for 30 min with constant magnetic stirring. A qualitative and semi‐quantitative analysis between the investigated apple species has been established. It was possible to identify about 100 of volatile compounds among pulp (46, 45, and 39), peel (64, 60, and 64), and entire fruit (65, 43, and 50) in PP, PS, and SS apples, respectively. Ethyl esters, terpenes, and higher alcohols were found to be the most representative volatiles. α‐Farnesene, hexan‐1‐ol and hexyl 2‐methylbutyrate were the compounds found in the volatile profile of studied apples with the largest GC area, representing, on average, 24.71, 14.06, and 10.80% of the total volatile fraction from PP, PS, and SS apples. In PP entire apple, the most abundant compounds identified were α‐farnesene (30.49%), the unknown compound m / z (69, 101, 157) (21.82%) and hexyl acetate (6.57%). Regarding PS entire apple the major compounds were α‐farnesene (16.87%), estragole (15.43%), hexan‐1‐ol (10.94), and E ‐2‐hexenal (10.67). α‐Farnesene (30.3%), hexan‐1‐ol (18.90%), 2‐methylbutanoic acid (4.7%), and pentan‐1‐ol (4.6%) were also found as SS entire apple volatiles present in a higher relative content. Principal component analysis (PCA) of the results clustered the apples into three groups according to geographic origin. Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) was performed in order to detect the volatile compounds able to differentiate the three kinds of apples investigated. The most important contributions to the differentiation of the PP, PS, and SS apples were ethyl hexanoate, hexyl 2‐methylbutyrate, E , E ‐2,4‐heptadienal, p ‐ethyl styrene, and E ‐2‐hexenal.