Premium
Accumulating resampling (modulation) in comprehensive two‐dimensional capillary GC (GC×GC)
Author(s) -
Blumberg Leonid M.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
journal of separation science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.72
H-Index - 102
eISSN - 1615-9314
pISSN - 1615-9306
DOI - 10.1002/jssc.200800424
Subject(s) - undersampling , resampling , chemistry , chromatography , oversampling , dimension (graph theory) , sampling (signal processing) , gas chromatography , interpolation (computer graphics) , standard deviation , analytical chemistry (journal) , two dimensional gas , mathematics , statistics , physics , detector , optics , combinatorics , motion (physics) , optoelectronics , cmos , classical mechanics , artificial intelligence , computer science
During each sampling period, an accumulating resampler (modulator) in comprehensive 2‐D chromatography accumulates all eluite from the first‐dimension column and reinjects the whole or a portion of the accumulated material into the second‐dimension column. The detrimental effect of the resampling on peak capacity of a 2‐D separation comes from the broadening of the peaks along the first‐dimension due to the resampling itself and due to the subsequent peak reconstruction. Sampling density (ρ S ) of resampling is the number of sampling periods per standard deviation of a peak at the outlet of the first‐dimension column. It is shown that a simple formula describes the peak broadening as a function of ρ S at any (even practically too low or too high) ρ S , for the peaks of any (not necessarily Gaussian) shape, for a wide class of peak reconstruction techniques, and for any 2‐D separation (GC×GC, LC×LC, etc .). In capillary GC×GC, optimal ρ S (ρ S,Opt ) depends on the type of the peak reconstruction and on the degree of the gas decompression along the second‐dimension column. When reconstructing using linear interpolation, ρ S,Opt = 0.7 at large and ρ S,Opt = 0.5 at small gas decompression. The choice of exact optimal conditions is not critical. Thus, two‐fold departure of actual ρ S from ρ S,Opt in either direction (under‐ or oversampling) causes only 10% drop in the net peak capacity of GC×GC. The quantitative effect of a much greater undersampling is also evaluated.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom