z-logo
Premium
Quantitative structure‐retention relationships in reversed‐phase liquid chromatography using several stationary and mobile phases
Author(s) -
Vonk Erik C.,
Lewandowska Katarzyna,
Claessens Henk A.,
Kaliszan Roman,
Cramers Carel A.
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
journal of separation science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.72
H-Index - 102
eISSN - 1615-9314
pISSN - 1615-9306
DOI - 10.1002/jssc.200301328
Subject(s) - chemistry , chromatography , phase (matter) , reversed phase chromatography , acetonitrile , polarizability , analyte , high performance liquid chromatography , analytical chemistry (journal) , molecule , organic chemistry
Quantitative Structure‐Retention Relationships (QSRRs) have been employed to study retention mechanism of Reversed‐Phase Liquid Chromatography (RPLC). Two C 18 and two C 8 columns were used with mobile phases containing methanol, acetonitrile, and tetrahydrofuran in concentrations ranging from 40 to 90 ( v/v )% in water. QSRR equations derived are generally characterized by a satisfactory quality of fit, although missing data or a low average retention can decrease the goodness‐of‐fit. In agreement with literature the most important retention descriptors appeared to be the analyte's molecular volume and its hydrogen‐bond accepting basicity, but also the polarity/polarizability, hydrogen‐bond donating acidity, and excess molar refraction showed statistical significance in several cases. Relatively small, but significant differences between the two C 18 stationary phases were observed. The differences between C 8 and C 18 column types were more pronounced. The influence of the mobile phase on regression coefficients is more difficult to interpret, because of adsorption of mobile phase constituents by the stationary phase. However, the importance of this partitioning of water and modifier is illustrated by the practically identical trends in b values for the three modifiers studied, while the trends in v values are significantly different. Principal component analysis of the QSRR regression coefficients demonstrated the prevailing role of the mobile phase for chromatographic properties of the RPLC systems studied as compared to the stationary phase.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here