Premium
Significance of estrogen receptors and cathepsin D tissue detection in gastric adenocarcinoma
Author(s) -
Theodoropoulos George E.,
Panoussopoulos Dimitris,
Golematis Basil Ch.,
Lazaris Andreas Ch.,
Davaris Panagiotis
Publication year - 1995
Publication title -
journal of surgical oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.201
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1096-9098
pISSN - 0022-4790
DOI - 10.1002/jso.2930580308
Subject(s) - cathepsin d , estrogen receptor , immunohistochemistry , cathepsin , pathology , medicine , estrogen , adenocarcinoma , cancer , cathepsin l , cancer research , breast cancer , biology , enzyme , biochemistry
Estrogen receptors (ERs) have recently been reported to be present in carcinomas of stomach, an organ that has so far been considered as nontarget for sex hormones. Cathepsin D is an estrogen‐regulated lysosomal protease that has been overexpressed in breast cancer. ER and cathepsin D immunohistochemical expression were studied in this research in order to estimate their association to known histopathological and clinical parameters and their possible prognostic significance as well. Sixty‐two patients with gastric adenocarcinomas were included in this study. The cancers were studied immunohistochemically concerning ER positivity in tumor cell nuclei and cathepsin D cytoplasmic expression. Nuclear ER staining was detected in tumor cells of 25% of male and 27% of female patients. ER positivity was demonstrated mainly in the well and moderately differentiated carcinomas; 87.5% of ER(+) tumors were also characterized as cathepsin D positive and a significant correlation between ER and cathepsin D positive expression was demonstrated ( P < 0.05). Cytoplasmic cathepsin D expression was observed in carcinomatous cells of 70.9% of gastric tumors. Early tumor stage and good differentiation were significantly associated with increased cathepsin D expression ( P < 0.05, P < 0.001). Histologic type, degree of differentiation and tumor stage were significantly correlated to survival ( P < 0.05, P < 0.001 and P < 0.001). The patients who were cathepsin D(+) had a significant prognostic advantage over the cathepsin D(‐) patients ( P < 0.001). The presence of ER and estrogen‐regulated cathepsin D indicates the involvement of sex hormonal factors in these tumors and cathepsin D positive expression in tumor cells seems to be related to better prognosis. Their biological, clinical, and prognostic roles remain to be further elucidated. © 1995 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.