Premium
Extended single transverse neck incision for composite resections: Does it work?
Author(s) -
Myssiorek David,
Becker Gary D.
Publication year - 1991
Publication title -
journal of surgical oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.201
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1096-9098
pISSN - 0022-4790
DOI - 10.1002/jso.2930480206
Subject(s) - medicine , cosmesis , surgery , neck dissection , incidence (geometry) , dissection (medical) , carcinoma , physics , optics
Since Crile's original description of neck dissection in 1906 (Crile GW: JAMA 47:1780–1786, 1906), a variety of neck incisions has been described, suggesting that none is sufficiently versatile to satisfy the criteria necessary for the ideal neck flap. Single transverse neck incisions (STNI) for complete neck dissections have been performed since the 1950s but are not as commonly used as trifurcate incisions. A criticism of the STNI is that the perceived difficulty exposing the surgical field may compromise removal of disease and impair normal surgical technique, resulting in a higher incidence of recurrent neck disease and postoperative complications. One hundred nine patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were operated using the STNI. There was no incidence of skin necrosis or carotid artery hemorrhage. Fourteen percent developed fistulae and 12% developed wound dehiscences. Recurrence in the operated neck was not identified. Cosmesis was considered good in all patients. We conclude that STNI does not result in an increased incidence of postoperative complications or recurrent neck disease compared with standard trifurcate incisions.