z-logo
Premium
Proposed method to study the factors affecting local control with combined external beam and interstitial implantation of mobile tongue and floor of mouth
Author(s) -
Hintz Brace L.,
Kagan A. Robert,
Chan Paul,
Rao Aroor R.,
Nussbaum Herman,
Ryoo Monica C.,
Wollin Myron
Publication year - 1986
Publication title -
journal of surgical oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.201
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1096-9098
pISSN - 0022-4790
DOI - 10.1002/jso.2930330415
Subject(s) - medicine , tongue , nuclear medicine , floor of mouth , external beam radiation , complication , external beam radiotherapy , cone beam ct , basal cell , radiation therapy , implant , surgery , radiology , brachytherapy , pathology , computed tomography
Twenty‐seven patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the mobile tongue and floor of the mouth were treated with external beam and interstitial radiation. Good prognostic factors were T 1 N 0 , T 2 N 0 , superficial tumors, tumor shrinkage by 75% with external beam, and no apparent tumor clinically 2 months after treatment. On the other hand, T 3 N 0 , T 1‐3 N 1 , and deeply necrotic tumors had a poor prognosis. We recommend using a flexible afterloading system to implant the initial local tumor volume (not just the residual nidus) that does not exceed 45 cm 3 . The minimum (reference) dose was prescribed to a surface 1/2 cm beyond the most peripheral rim of radioactive sources. For acceptable local control and complication rates, our suggested minimum (reference) doses are ⩽7,500 rads for T 1 (or a time‐dose‐fractionation [TDF] of 131‐140), <8,000 rads for T 2 (TDF of 131‐140), and probably < 8,500 rads for T 3 (TDF of ⩽ 150). These guidelines should be considered preliminary.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom