Premium
Classification of breast tissue expander infections: Back to the basics
Author(s) -
Kraenzlin Franca S.,
Saunders Heather,
Aliu Oluseyi,
Cooney Damon,
Rosson Gedge D.,
Sacks Justin M.,
Broderick Kristen,
Manahan Michele A.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of surgical oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.201
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1096-9098
pISSN - 0022-4790
DOI - 10.1002/jso.25500
Subject(s) - medicine , infection rate , disease control , antibiotics , infection control , breast reconstruction , surgery , breast cancer , cancer , virology , microbiology and biotechnology , biology
Background Infections following tissue expander (TE) placement are frequent complications in breast reconstruction. While breast surgery is a clean case, implant‐based breast reconstruction has rates of infection up to 31%, decidedly higher than the typical 1% to 2% rate of surgical site infections (SSI). Few authors use the Center for Disease Control's (CDC) SSI definition for TE infections. We highlight how adoption of a consistent definition of TE infection may change how infections are researched, categorized, and ultimately managed. Methods Two researchers with definitional discrepancies of infection performed an independent analysis of all postmastectomy patients receiving TEs (n = 175) in 2017. Results Researcher One, using a clinical definition, delineated an infection rate of 19.4%. Antibiotics alone successfully treated 50% of cases. Researcher Two found an infection rate of 13.7% using CDC criteria. These infections were further delineated by a SSI rate of 6.3% and a TE infection rate post port access of 7.4%. Only 45.5% SSI's and 15.4% of TE infections were salvaged with antibiotics alone. Conclusions Rigorous adoption of CDC criteria for infection characterization in published research will help standardize the definition of infection and allow surgeons to create evidence‐based infection prevention regimens.