z-logo
Premium
Resection of retroperitoneal sarcoma en‐bloc with inferior vena cava: 20 year outcomes of a single institution
Author(s) -
Blair Alex B.,
Reames Bradley N.,
Singh Jasvinder,
Gani Faiz,
Overton Heidi N.,
Beaulieu Robert J.,
Lum Ying W.,
Black James H.,
Johnston Fabian M.,
Ahuja Nita
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
journal of surgical oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.201
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1096-9098
pISSN - 0022-4790
DOI - 10.1002/jso.25096
Subject(s) - medicine , inferior vena cava , resection , vena cava , sarcoma , surgery , radiology , surgical resection , pathology
Background Margin negative resection offers the best chance of long‐term survival in retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). En‐bloc resection of adjacent structures, including the inferior vena cava (IVC), is often required to achieve negative margins. We review our 20‐year experience of en‐bloc IVC and RPS resection. Methods Retrospective review of patients with RPS resection involving the IVC were matched 1:3 by age and histology to RPS without IVC resection. Prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) were assessed. Results Thirty‐two patients underwent RPS resection en‐bloc with IVC. They were matched with 96 cases of RPS without IVC resection. Median OS of 59 months and DFS 18 months in IVC resection group was comparable to RPS resection without vascular involvement: median OS 65 months, DFS 18 months ( P  = 0.519, P  = 0.604). On multivariate analyses, R2 margin (OS: HR = 6.52 [95%CI: 1.18‐36.09], P  = 0.032) was associated with inferior OS. R2 margin and increased number of organs resected (DFS: HR = 5.07, [1.15‐22.27], P  = 0.031, HR = 1.28 [1.01‐1.62], P  = 0.014) were associated with inferior DFS. Reconstructions included graft ( n  = 19, 59%), patch ( n  = 4, 13%), primary repair ( n  = 6, 19%), and ligation ( n  = 4, 13%). Conclusions RPS resection en‐bloc with IVC can achieve equivalent rates of DFS and OS to patients without vascular involvement.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here