Premium
Early assessment of post‐surgical outcomes with pre‐pectoral breast reconstruction: A literature review and meta‐analysis
Author(s) -
Chatterjee Abhishek,
Nahabedian Maurice Y.,
Gabriel Allen,
Macarios David,
Parekh Mousam,
Wang Fang,
Griffin Leah,
Sigalove Steven
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
journal of surgical oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.201
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1096-9098
pISSN - 0022-4790
DOI - 10.1002/jso.24938
Subject(s) - medicine , capsular contracture , seroma , surgery , breast reconstruction , pectoral muscle , mammaplasty , complication , odds ratio , dehiscence , mastectomy , meta analysis , confidence interval , wound dehiscence , breast cancer , cancer
Background Pre‐pectoral breast reconstruction is an emerging surgical approach. This study provides an early assessment of outcomes with the technique. Methods A comprehensive literature review was performed through searches of PubMed ® /MEDLINE ® to identify studies on pre‐pectoral reconstruction. Patient characteristics and outcomes were extracted from studies and pooled. Linear relationships between complication rates and patient characteristics with pre‐pectoral reconstruction were analyzed. A meta‐analysis compared complication rates between pre‐pectoral and dual‐plane reconstruction. Results Fourteen studies (406 women/654 breasts) were included. The most common complications with pre‐pectoral reconstruction were flap necrosis (7.8%), seroma (6.7%), capsular contracture (5.8%), and explantation (4.6%). No hyperanimation was reported. Significant correlation between previous radiation and flap necrosis, post‐operative chemotherapy and infection, hypertension and flap necrosis, diabetes and dehiscence, and smoking and explantation were found. A meta‐analysis of four studies comparing pre‐pectoral (135 women/219 breasts) and dual‐plane (230/408) reconstruction found no significant difference for likelihood of infection (odds ratio, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.16‐1.30), explantation (0.83; 0.29‐2.38), necrosis (1.61; 0.77‐3.36), seroma (1.88; 0.71‐5.02), dehiscence (1.84; 0.68‐4.95), or capsular contracture (0.14; 0.02‐1.14). Conclusions Complication rates are comparable following pre‐pectoral and dual‐plane reconstruction, indicating the pre‐pectoral technique may be a feasible option for appropriate patients.