z-logo
Premium
Outcomes of vascularized versus non‐vascularized lymph node transplant in animal models for lymphedema. Review of the literature
Author(s) -
Cornelissen Anouk J.M.,
Qiu Shan Shan,
Lopez Penha Tiara,
Keuter Xavier,
Piatkowski de Grzymala Andrzej,
Tuinder Stefania,
van der Hulst Rene
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
journal of surgical oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.201
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1096-9098
pISSN - 0022-4790
DOI - 10.1002/jso.24342
Subject(s) - medicine , lymph node , lymphedema , lymphatic system , lymph , anastomosis , cochrane library , secondary lymphedema , transplantation , dissection (medical) , lymphatic vessel , surgery , pathology , meta analysis , cancer , breast cancer , metastasis
Lymph node transfer has been performed to treat lymphedema for several years. The goal of this procedure is to provide a bridge between the lymphatic system distal and proximal to the lymph node dissection. There is a lack of consensus about the necessity of an additional vascular anastomosis for the transplanted lymph nodes. A systematic literature search in Cochrane Library database CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE of animal studies using lymph node transplantation with and without additional vascularization was performed in March 2016. The strategy used for the search was: ((“Models, Animal”[Mesh]) AND ((“Lymphedema”[Mesh]) OR “Lymph Nodes”[Mesh]) OR “Lymph Node Excision”[Mesh])) AND ((vascularized lymph node transfer) OR ((non‐vascularized lymph node transfer) OR lymph node graft)). The primary outcomes were: survival of transplanted lymph node and lymphatic vessel regeneration. Sixteen studies were included. Vascularization and the use of growth factors were significantly associated with lymph node survival. Lymphatic vessels regeneration was independent from vascularization. According to the results of the current study, additional vascular anastomosis might improve the transplanted lymph node survival. Further studies in both experimental and clinical setting are needed in order to support it. J. Surg. Oncol. 2017;115:32–36 . © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here