z-logo
Premium
Increased utilization of postmastectomy radiotherapy in the United States from 2003 to 2011 in patients with one to three tumor positive nodes
Author(s) -
Yao Katharine,
Liederbach Erik,
Lutfi Waseem,
Wang ChiHsiung,
Hou Ningqi,
Karrison Theodore,
Huo Dezheng
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
journal of surgical oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.201
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1096-9098
pISSN - 0022-4790
DOI - 10.1002/jso.24071
Subject(s) - medicine , breast cancer , radiation therapy , logistic regression , oncology , lymphovascular invasion , stage (stratigraphy) , t stage , sentinel node , cancer , metastasis , paleontology , biology
Background and Objectives There have been few recent studies that have examined the use of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) for patients with 1–3 positive nodes. Methods We utilized the National Cancer Data Base to examine trends in PMRT for 346,218 patients with Stage I–III breast cancer from 2003 to 2011. Neoadjuvant therapy cases were excluded. Log linear models examined trends in PMRT and logistic regressions were used to examine factors related to PMRT. Results The proportion of pT1‐2N1 patients receiving PMRT increased from 23.9% in 2003 to 36.4% in 2011 with an annual percent change (APC) of 6.2% ( P  < 0.001). There were significant increases in the use of PMRT amongst patients with one (APC = 7.7%), two (APC = 6.7%), and three (APC = 4.2%) positive nodes. In 2011, 27.8%, 43.8%, and 57.8% of patients with one, two or three positive nodes underwent PMRT, respectively. The number of positive nodes and tumor size were the strongest independent predictors of PMRT in the 1–3 node group; lymphovascular invasion, invasive lobular histology, and triple negative phenotypes were also associated with PMRT use. Conclusion PMRT for patients with pT1‐2N1 disease has increased with the greatest increase seen in those with one tumor positive node. Tumor factors remain strong independent predictors of PMRT. J. Surg. Oncol. 2015;112:809–814 . © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here