Premium
Determining breast cancer axillary surgery within the surveillance epidemiology and end results‐Medicare database
Author(s) -
Schmocker Ryan K.,
CarettaWeyer Holly,
Weiss Jennifer M.,
Ronk Katie,
Havlena Jeffrey,
LoConte Noelle K.,
Decker Marquita,
Smith Maureen A.,
Greenberg Caprice C.,
Neuman Heather B.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
journal of surgical oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.201
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1096-9098
pISSN - 0022-4790
DOI - 10.1002/jso.23579
Subject(s) - medicine , breast cancer , sentinel lymph node , axillary lymph node dissection , concordance , axilla , epidemiology , surveillance, epidemiology, and end results , breast surgery , lymph node , general surgery , surgery , cancer , cancer registry
Background Use of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is under‐reported by cancer registries' “Scope of Regional Lymph Node Surgery” variable. In 2011, the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program recommended against its use to determine extent of axillary surgery, leaving a gap in the utilization of claims data for breast cancer research. The objective was to develop an algorithm using SEER registry and claims data to classify extent of axillary surgery for breast cancer. Methods We analyzed data for 24,534 breast cancer patients. CPT codes and number of examined lymph nodes classified the extent of axillary surgery. The final algorithm was validated by comparing the algorithm derived extent of axillary surgery to direct chart review for 100 breast cancer patients treated at our breast center. Results Using the algorithm, 13% had no axillary surgery, 56% SLNB and 31% axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). SLNB was performed in 77% of node negative patients and ALND in 72% of node positive. In our validation study, concordance between algorithm and direct chart review was 97%. Conclusions Given recognized inaccuracies in cancer registries' “Scope of Regional Lymph Node Surgery” variable, these findings have high utility for health services researchers studying breast cancer treatment. J. Surg. Oncol. 2014 109:756–759 . © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.