Premium
The impact of re‐excision of inadequately resected soft tissue sarcomas on surgical therapy, results, and prognosis: A single institution experience with 682 patients
Author(s) -
Funovics Philipp T.,
Vaselic Sanja,
Panotopoulos Joannis,
Kotz Rainer I.,
Dominkus Martin
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
journal of surgical oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.201
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1096-9098
pISSN - 0022-4790
DOI - 10.1002/jso.21639
Subject(s) - medicine , soft tissue , surgery , incidence (geometry) , pathological , resection , overall survival , survival rate , surgical resection , soft tissue sarcoma , physics , optics
Background and Objectives Due to their rare incidence soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are often resected without clear margins. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of re‐excision of STS on survival. Methods Out of 752 patients with STS (406 men and 346 women, average age 51 years), 310 patients were referred after an inadequate resection, 442 patients presented for primary treatment. Six hundred eighty‐two patients were compared over a mean period of 65 months (median, 36 months) according to the treatment groups regarding their survival, clinical, surgical, and pathological data. Results The 5‐year survival rate of 621 surgically treated patients was 53.9%. There was a continuous improvement in survival during the whole treatment period in the respective decades. The overall survival rate in both groups was not significantly different regardless of low‐ or high‐grade malignancies. Patients with a re‐resection did not have a higher rate of local recurrences; patients with a primary resection had a worse prognosis regarding metastases. A re‐resection within 12 weeks indicated a better prognosis. Conclusions An inadequate excision of a STS does not cogently mean deterioration of overall survival but necessitates an ample and quick re‐resection. J. Surg. Oncol. 2010;102:626–633. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.