z-logo
Premium
Impact of systemic inflammation on outcome following resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
Author(s) -
Gomez Dhanwant,
MorrisStiff Gareth,
Toogood Giles J.,
Lodge J. Peter A.,
Prasad K. Rajendra
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
journal of surgical oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.201
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1096-9098
pISSN - 0022-4790
DOI - 10.1002/jso.21001
Subject(s) - medicine , neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio , multivariate analysis , univariate analysis , intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma , lymph node , histopathology , adverse effect , gastroenterology , disease , surgery , overall survival , pathology
Aims To analyse the results and prognostic factors affecting disease‐free and overall survival following potentially curative resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC). Methods Patients undergoing resection for IHCC from January 1996 to December 2006 were included. Data analysed included demographics, clinical and histopathology data. Results Twenty‐seven patients were identified with a median age of 57 (32–84) years. The 1‐, 3‐ and 5‐year overall and disease‐free survival rates were 74%, 16% and 16%, and 44%, 15% and 15%, respectively. On univariate analysis, age <65 years, female gender, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≥ 5, micro‐vascular invasion and lymph node involvement were predictors of poorer overall survival. Multivariate analysis did not identify any independent predictors of overall survival. A NLR ≥ 5 was the only adverse predictor of disease‐free survival. The median disease‐free survival of patients with NLR ≥ 5 was 6 months compared to 18 months for those with NLR < 5. There was a significant association between patients with a NLR ≥ 5 and larger tumour size, satellite lesions, micro‐vascular invasion and lymph node involvement. Conclusion Long‐term outcome following resection of IHCC is poor. A pre‐operative NLR ≥ 5 was an adverse predictor of disease‐free survival and was associated with an aggressive tumour biology profile. J. Surg. Oncol. 2008;97:513–518. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here