Premium
Proposal for a new definition of true cardia carcinoma
Author(s) -
Ichikura Takashi,
Chochi Kentaro,
Sugasawa Hidekazu,
Mochizuki Hidetaka
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
journal of surgical oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.201
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1096-9098
pISSN - 0022-4790
DOI - 10.1002/jso.20727
Subject(s) - medicine , carcinoma , esophagogastric junction , stage (stratigraphy) , multivariate analysis , cancer , gastroenterology , metastasis , histology , adenocarcinoma , oncology , paleontology , biology
Background and Objectives It remains controversial whether cardia carcinoma should be categorized and treated as esophageal cancer or gastric cancer. The purpose of this study was to develop a reasonable definition of cardia carcinoma. Methods Patients with Siewert type II carcinomas were divided into two subgroups: 25 patients with a tumor center within 1 cm of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) (type IIA) and 22 patients with tumor center 1–2 cm aboral of the EGJ (type IIB). Patients with subcardia carcinomas, 40 with invasion to the EGJ (type III) and 110 without (type IIIe−), were used as controls. Results The patients with type IIB carcinomas showed no different characteristics from those with type III or type IIIe− carcinomas, except for the stage of the disease. On the other hand, those with type IIA carcinomas were associated with a higher male/female ratio, higher incidences of elevated appearance, differentiated histology, and mediastinal node metastasis, and a significantly lower survival rate as compared with patients with subcardia carcinomas. Multivariate survival analysis revealed that type IIA is a significant prognostic determinant, but that type IIB is not. Conclusion Type IIA carcinomas should be treated as true cardia carcinoma; type IIB as subcardia carcinoma. Our results should be confirmed by a prospective study. J. Surg. Oncol. 2007;95:561–566. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.