z-logo
Premium
A practical scoring system based upon ROC analysis for evaluating potential lymph nodes metastasis during gastric surgery
Author(s) -
Wu Yulian,
Chen Jian,
Yu Junxiu,
Gao Shunliang,
Shen Hongwei
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
journal of surgical oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.201
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1096-9098
pISSN - 0022-4790
DOI - 10.1002/jso.20559
Subject(s) - medicine , receiver operating characteristic , lymphadenectomy , logistic regression , stage (stratigraphy) , kappa , scoring system , predictive value , multivariate analysis , lymph node , stepwise regression , cancer , predictive value of tests , lymph node metastasis , radiology , metastasis , surgery , mathematics , paleontology , geometry , biology
Background and Objectives Current preoperative N staging does not offer an accurate estimation of lymph node involvement. We establish a new scoring system for predicting N stages to guide a rational lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer. Methods Variables correlated with N stages were selected by multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis. Variables granted the different scores according to the odds ratio (OR). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to generate scoring ranges from N0 to N3. The agreement between predicted N staging and actual pN classification was analyzed using kappa statistics. Results Tumor size, depth of invasion, and histological types were selected to establish the scoring system. Scores 0–4, 5–7, 8–9, and 10–13 were postulated to predict N0‐3, respectively. The predicted N stage has good agreement with the actual pN classifications. The negative predictive values for N0‐3 were 87.0, 86.4, 90.4, and 90.2%; the positive predictive values were 74.7, 62.8, 57.3, and 69.6%, respectively. The accuracy is 82% for N0‐1, and 83.7% for N2‐3. Conclusions The new scoring system can predict the N stage of gastric cancer. With its good negative predictive value, it is possible to minimize the potential hazards of applying a more extensive lymph node dissection than necessary. J. Surg. Oncol. 2006;93:534–540. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here