z-logo
Premium
Free vascularized fibular grafting for reconstruction after tumor resection in the upper extremity
Author(s) -
Gebert C.,
Hillmann A.,
Schwappach A.,
Hoffmann Ch.,
Hardes J.,
Kleinheinz J.,
Gosheger G.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
journal of surgical oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.201
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1096-9098
pISSN - 0022-4790
DOI - 10.1002/jso.20326
Subject(s) - medicine , grafting , resection , surgery , fibula , anatomy , tibia , chemistry , organic chemistry , polymer
Background Limb salvage is viable in the majority of patients with malignant bone tumors, but especially in case of extensive tumors and bad soft tissue conditions, it is challenging in upper extremity. Objectives/Method The clinical and radiological results of 21 patients, who had free vascularized fibular grafts (VFG), for diaphyseal (14), and epipyseal (7) defect reconstruction of the upper extremity, are presented. The indications for VFG were resection after osteosarcoma (9 cases), Ewings sarcoma (9 cases), chondrosarcoma (1 case), rhabdomyosarcoma (1 case), and 1 case of fibrous dysplasia. The 20 malignant tumors were staged as follows: 2a (1), 2b (18), 3 (1). The mean follow‐up was 43.6 months (min 6.0–max 131.9). Functional results were described and graded quantitatively according to the MSTS‐score. Results Results were satisfactory with regard to pain, emotional acceptance, manual dexterity, and function. Lifting ability was decreased in two patients. Hypertrophy index was 31% (min 13%–max 71%). Main complications were fracture (5), pseudoarthrosis (4), prolonged wound healing (4), temporary nerve irritation (2), and deep infection (1). Re‐operation was required in eight patients (12 operations). Conclusion VFG offers a good possibility for biological reconstruction of large skeletal defects, with an acceptable complication and re‐operation rate. When conservative treatment of complications was not successful, further surgery led to recovery in the majority of cases. J. Surg. Oncol. 2006;94:114–127. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here