Premium
Reducing the carbon footprint per unit of economic benefit is a new method to accomplish low‐carbon agriculture. A case study: adjustment of the planting structure in Zhangbei County, China
Author(s) -
Wang Zhanbiao,
Zhang Jizong,
Zhang Lifeng
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of the science of food and agriculture
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.782
H-Index - 142
eISSN - 1097-0010
pISSN - 0022-5142
DOI - 10.1002/jsfa.9714
Subject(s) - carbon footprint , greenhouse gas , agriculture , environmental science , sowing , unit (ring theory) , agricultural economics , carbon fibers , sustainability , carbon sequestration , natural resource economics , agricultural engineering , agronomy , economics , engineering , carbon dioxide , geography , mathematics , ecology , mathematics education , archaeology , algorithm , composite number , biology
BACKGROUND The development of low‐carbon agriculture is promising for mitigating climate change. This study used adjustments to the planting structure in Zhangbei County, China, as an example to evaluate whether the carbon footprint per unit of economic benefit is a suitable indicator of low‐carbon agriculture and to determine if low‐carbon agriculture is not necessarily low‐input non‐intensive agriculture. RESULTS The results showed that total greenhouse gas emissions increased; therefore, the adjustments to the planting structure were ostensibly not a low‐carbon process. However, if we obtain the same economic benefit as the actual distribution of the planting industry by adopting the scenario of planting only grain crops, then the annual greenhouse gas emissions would be 1608.00 × 10 3 t CO 2 eq, and 5769.94 × 10 3 ha of farmland would be required. However, if we adopt the scenario of planting only vegetable crops, then only 82.52 × 10 3 ha of farmland would be required, and the annual greenhouse gas emissions would be 323.52 × 10 3 t CO 2 eq. CONCLUSIONS These results indicated that the carbon footprint per unit of economic benefit is a suitable indicator to assess agricultural sustainability and that intensive agriculture with high input and high output is a form of low‐carbon agriculture if the carbon footprint per unit of economic benefit is low. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry