Premium
Determination of maize kernel hardness: comparison of different laboratory tests to predict dry‐milling performance
Author(s) -
Blandino Massimo,
Mancini Mattia Ciro,
Peila Alessandro,
Rolle Luca,
Vanara Francesca,
Reyneri Amedeo
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
journal of the science of food and agriculture
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.782
H-Index - 142
eISSN - 1097-0010
pISSN - 0022-5142
DOI - 10.1002/jsfa.4027
Subject(s) - endosperm , test weight , starch , friability , amylose , sphericity , vickers hardness test , materials science , grinding , mathematics , chemistry , food science , composite material , microstructure , agronomy , grain yield , biology , biochemistry , polymer , ethyl cellulose
BACKGROUND: Numerous foods are produced from maize, and grain hardness has been described to have an impact on grain end‐use value, and in particular for dry‐milling performance. RESULTS: Thirty‐three samples of commercial hybrids have been analysed for test weight (TW), thousand‐kernel weight (TKW), hard:soft endosperm ratio (H/S), milling time (MT) and total milling energy (TME) through the Stenvert hardness test, coarse:fine material ratio (C/F), break force (HF) and break energy (HWF) through the puncture test, floating test (FLT), kernel dimensions and sphericity (S), protein (PC), starch (SC), lipid (LC), ash (AC) content and amylose:amylopectin ratio (AS/AP). Total grit yield (TGY) has been obtained through a micromilling procedure and used to compare the efficiency of the tests to predict the dry‐milling performance. TW, H/S, MT, TME, C/F, FLT, S, PC, SC and AS/AP were significantly correlated with each other. TW has been confirmed to be a simple estimator of grain hardness. Among the hardness tests, C/F was shown to be the best descriptor of maize milling ability, followed by FLT. A good correlation with TGY has also been observed with H/S, MT, TME and PC, while SC, S and AS/AP seem to play a minor role. The puncture test (HF and HWF) did not offer good indications on the impact of hardness on kernel grinding properties. CONCLUSION: This study can be considered as a contribution towards determining kernel properties which influence maize hardness measurement in relation to the end‐use processing performance. Copyright © 2010 Society of Chemical Industry