z-logo
Premium
Potential use of visible and near infrared reflectance spectroscopy for the estimation of nitrogen fractions in forages harvested from permanent meadows
Author(s) -
Valdés Carmen,
Andrés Sonia,
Giráldez F Javier,
García Ricardo,
Calleja Alfredo
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
journal of the science of food and agriculture
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.782
H-Index - 142
eISSN - 1097-0010
pISSN - 0022-5142
DOI - 10.1002/jsfa.2309
Subject(s) - chemistry , nitrogen , near infrared reflectance spectroscopy , forage , analytical chemistry (journal) , zoology , chromatography , near infrared spectroscopy , agronomy , biology , organic chemistry , neuroscience
One‐hundred and ninety‐two herbage samples from permanent meadows located in the mountains of León (NW Spain) were analyzed for total nitrogen (total N), nitrogen in trichloroacetic acid precipitated matter (TCAN), borate–phosphate buffer insoluble nitrogen (BPBN), neutral‐detergent insoluble nitrogen (NDIN) and acid‐detergent insoluble nitrogen (ADIN). These data were used to calculate the partition of nitrogen fractions proposed by the Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System (CNCPS): A (total N − TCAN), B 1 (TCAN − BPBN), B 2 (BPBN − NDIN), B 3 (NDIN − ADIN) and C (ADIN). Near‐infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) technology accurately predicted total N, TCAN and NDIN, as judged by coefficient of determination ( R 2 ) and ratio performance deviation (RPD) values greater than 0.90 and 2.5, respectively. The rest of the insoluble N fractions (BPBN and ADIN) were predicted with less accuracy by NIRS. Estimations of CNCPS N fractions (A, B 1 , B 2 , B 3 and C) using visible–NIR spectra of forage samples did not allow accurate predictions ( R 2 < 0.90; RPD < 2.5). Copyright © 2005 Society of Chemical Industry

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here