Premium
Screening and distinction of coffee brews based on headspace solid phase microextraction/gas chromatography/principal component analysis
Author(s) -
Rocha Sílvia,
Maeztu Laura,
Barros António,
Cid Concepción,
Coimbra Manuel A
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
journal of the science of food and agriculture
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.782
H-Index - 142
eISSN - 1097-0010
pISSN - 0022-5142
DOI - 10.1002/jsfa.1607
Subject(s) - solid phase microextraction , chemistry , chromatography , gas chromatography , gas chromatography–mass spectrometry , polydimethylsiloxane , mass spectrometry , extraction (chemistry) , organic chemistry
The volatile profiles of espresso and plunger (cafetière) coffees prepared from (1) an 80:20 (w/w) blend of natural roasted Robusta and Arabica (Robusta Natural blend), (2) a 40:40:20 (w/w/w) blend of Robusta Natural blend, Robusta torrefacto roast (850 g kg −1 Robusta, 150 g kg −1 sugar) and (3) natural roasted pure Arabica were established by headspace solid phase microextraction (SPME) after selection of the fibre coating (polyacrylate or polydimethylsiloxane) and the temperature and time of extraction. For the analysis of furans and indoles the polyacrylate coating proved to be more suitable; however, for the overall characterisation of the volatile composition of espresso and plunger coffees the polydimethylsiloxane coating was chosen. SPME/gas chromatography (GC)/mass spectrometry (MS) analyses allowed the identification of 37 compounds: four aldehydes, two ketones, 11 furans, 10 pyrazines, two pyridines, three phenolic compounds, two indoles, one lactone, one ester and one benzothiazine. The volatile composition was related more to the botanical variety (Arabica or Robusta) than to the method of preparation of the brew (espresso or plunger). Furthermore, use of the variability provided solely by the GC peak areas and respective retention times, combined with principal component analysis (PCA), yielded the information necessary for discrimination. The combined technique of headspace SPME/GC/PCA, as an alternative to conventional techniques based on GC/MS, is proposed as a lower‐cost, fast and reliable technique for the screening and distinction of coffee brews. Copyright © 2003 Society of Chemical Industry