z-logo
Premium
Who says change can be managed? Positions, perspectives and problematics
Author(s) -
Palmer Ian,
Dunford Richard
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
strategic change
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.527
H-Index - 16
eISSN - 1099-1697
pISSN - 1086-1718
DOI - 10.1002/jsc.600
Subject(s) - coaching , unintended consequences , change management (itsm) , sociology , public relations , business , epistemology , political science , management , marketing , economics , philosophy , lean manufacturing
We pick up a current challenge in the change management literature — whether change can be managed. The answer to this question depends upon the underlying image one has of both managing and change. We develop a model based upon two images of managing (management as controlling; management as shaping) and three images of change outcomes (intended, partially intended and unintended). From this we identify six views on managing change: directing, navigating, caretaking, coaching, interpreting and nurturing. We outline different theories associated with each of these views. Theorists and practitioners hold differing images of what ‘managing change’ actually means — which leads them to talk past each other when attempting to engage in dialogue around how change can be managed. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom