z-logo
Premium
Proposed typology of different publics of Austrian crowdfunding platforms
Author(s) -
AttuelMendès Laurence,
Caseau Cornelia,
Bonescu Mihaela
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
strategic change
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.527
H-Index - 16
eISSN - 1099-1697
pISSN - 1086-1718
DOI - 10.1002/jsc.2171
Subject(s) - typology , publics , relevance (law) , perspective (graphical) , field (mathematics) , point (geometry) , term (time) , social media , business , public relations , marketing , sociology , political science , computer science , physics , geometry , mathematics , quantum mechanics , artificial intelligence , politics , anthropology , pure mathematics , law
Crowdfunding, as a social media, benefits from an audience of different types of publics which can be categorized according to relational proximity and degree of expertise. Different publics interact in the field of crowdfunding. From the perspective of strategic management, “direct expert” must be mobilized in the short term when “indirect expert” should continue to be mobilized in the long term. From a theoretical point of view, this new typology raises the question of the relevance of segmentation criteria.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here