Carbon‐14 wiggle‐match dating of peat deposits: advantages and limitations | Zendy

Blaauw Maarten | Zendy; Van Geel Bas | Zendy; Mauquoy Dmitri | Zendy; Van Der Plicht Johannes | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Premium

Carbon‐14 wiggle‐match dating of peat deposits: advantages and limitations

Author(s) -

Blaauw Maarten,

Van Geel Bas,

Mauquoy Dmitri,

Van Der Plicht Johannes

Publication year - 2004

Publication title -

journal of quaternary science

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 1.142

H-Index - 94

eISSN - 1099-1417

pISSN - 0267-8179

DOI - 10.1002/jqs.810

Subject(s) - peat , holocene , geology , calibration , calibration curve , series (stratigraphy) , physical geography , matching (statistics) , radiocarbon dating , carbon fibers , paleontology , geodesy , climatology , archaeology , statistics , computer science , geography , mathematics , algorithm , composite number , detection limit

Carbon‐14 wiggle‐match dating (WMD) of peat deposits uses the non‐linear relationship between 14 C age and calendar age to match the shape of a series of closely spaced peat 14 C dates with the 14 C calibration curve. The method of WMD is discussed, and its advantages and limitations are compared with calibration of individual dates. A numerical approach to WMD is introduced that makes it possible to assess the precision of WMD chronologies. During several intervals of the Holocene, the 14 C calibration curve shows less pronounced fluctuations. We assess whether wiggle‐matching is also a feasible strategy for these parts of the 14 C calibration curve. High‐precision chronologies, such as obtainable with WMD, are needed for studies of rapid climate changes and their possible causes during the Holocene. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research