Premium
A 10 B e production‐rate calibration for the Arctic
Author(s) -
YOUNG NICOLÁs E.,
SCHAEFER JOERG M.,
BRINER JASON P.,
GOEHRING BRENT M.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
journal of quaternary science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.142
H-Index - 94
eISSN - 1099-1417
pISSN - 0267-8179
DOI - 10.1002/jqs.2642
Subject(s) - arctic , bay , moraine , geology , oceanography , physical geography , calibration , greenland ice sheet , glacial period , ice sheet , geography , paleontology , statistics , mathematics
We present a Baffin Bay 10 Be production‐rate calibration derived from glacial deposits in western Greenland and Baffin Island, and test our results against published 10 Be calibration datasets to develop an Arctic 10 Be production rate. Our calibration comprises: (i) 10 Be measurements from moraine boulders linked to a 14 C‐dated moraine at Jakobshavn Isfjord in western Greenland, (ii) an independent and previously published 10 Be production rate at Jakobshavn Isfjord and (iii) re‐measured 10 Be concentrations from a Baffin Island calibration site that is included in the north‐eastern North America dataset. Combined, we calculate a sea‐level/high‐latitude 10 Be production rate for the Baffin Bay region of 3.96 ± 0.07 atoms g −1 a −1 (Lal/Stone scaling model). After testing the Baffin Bay rate against calibration sites in Norway and north‐eastern North America, we calculate a more conservative Arctic production rate of 3.96 ± 0.15 atoms g −1 a −1 . The Baffin Bay and Arctic 10 Be production rates are indistinguishable from the north‐eastern North America 10 Be production rate (3.91 ± 0.19 atoms g −1 a −1 ) and yield overall uncertainties of <2–3.7% (1σ). These production rates reduce systematic uncertainties in 10 Be‐based chronologies of ice‐margin change and allow 10 Be‐based chronologies to be more confidently compared with high‐resolution climate records, such as those from Greenland ice cores.