z-logo
Premium
Sulfur fertilization strategy affects grass yield, nitrogen uptake, and nitrate leaching: A field lysimeter study #
Author(s) -
Aspel Claire,
Murphy Paul N. C.,
McLaughlin Michael J.,
Forrestal Patrick J.
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
journal of plant nutrition and soil science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.644
H-Index - 87
eISSN - 1522-2624
pISSN - 1436-8730
DOI - 10.1002/jpln.202100133
Subject(s) - leaching (pedology) , lysimeter , nitrate , chemistry , fertilizer , agronomy , nitrogen , loam , sulfur , ammonium nitrate , ammonium , ammonium sulfate , environmental science , environmental chemistry , soil water , soil science , organic chemistry , biology , chromatography
Background Globally and at the European Union level there are mounting concerns regarding nitrogen (N) losses from agricultural systems and pressure to reduce N losses to water and air. Suboptimal plant sulfur (S) availability can reduce plant N efficiency and thereby increase N loss potential. Climate change action demands lower sulfur dioxide emissions thus S deposition levels are at an all‐time low. Aims The objectives of the current study were to (1) determine the potential for adequate S nutrition to increase grassland yield and N efficiency, (2) determine if alleviating S deficiency reduces nitrate leaching, and (3) evaluate a number of strategies for applying S including the use of cattle slurry. Methods This work was completed using a free‐draining sandy loam grassland lysimeter facility. There were six treatments using calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN), CAN + calcium sulfate (CAN+S), ammonium sulfate + CAN (AS+CAN), and slurry (Slurry+CAN and Slurry+CAN+S, respectively) to deliver S strategies. The yield, plant N and S uptake, and nitrate and sulfate leachate were measured to compare treatments. Results Application of mineral S fertilizer increased yields significantly (up to 2,907 kg ha –1 ) and increased apparent fertilizer nitrogen recovery from 39% to 47–49%. Alleviating S deficiency also significantly decreased nitrate leaching to levels not differing significantly from the control. There was a reduction of 46% in nitrate leaching with the addition of mineral S (CAN+S and AS+CAN) compared to N only. The nitrate concentration standard for drinking water was not breached for treatments that included S (6.6–11 mg NO 3 – ‐N L –1 ), whereas it was breached for those without S (23–40 mg NO 3 – ‐N L –1 ). The S applied in the slurry treatment was not adequate (9 kg S ha –1 ) to meet plant requirements. Conclusion This study provides evidence that optimization of S nutrition has the potential to deliver large agronomic and environmental benefits along with potential as a nitrate leaching migration strategy on S‐deficient soils.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom