Premium
Predicting grapevine canopy nitrogen status using proximal sensors and near‐infrared reflectance spectroscopy
Author(s) -
Walker Harriet V.,
Jones Joanna E.,
Swarts Nigel D.,
Rodemann Thomas,
Kerslake Fiona,
Dambergs Robert G.
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of plant nutrition and soil science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.644
H-Index - 87
eISSN - 1522-2624
pISSN - 1436-8730
DOI - 10.1002/jpln.202000320
Subject(s) - vine , canopy , growing season , nitrogen , environmental science , sampling (signal processing) , vitis vinifera , horticulture , agronomy , botany , chemistry , biology , filter (signal processing) , organic chemistry , computer science , computer vision
Background : The current method employed by industry for tissue analysis to determine grapevine nitrogen (N) status is expensive and time intensive. Aims : This study explored the use of proximal sensors and Fourier transform near infrared spectroscopy (FT‐NIRS) to predict vine ( Vitis vinifera L.) canopy N status over two growing seasons in Southern Tasmania, Australia. Methods : The GreenSeeker, Crop Circle ACS‐430 and SPAD‐502 proximal sensors were used to measure vine canopies (cv. Pinot Noir and Chardonnay) at three sampling dates (January, February, March) in the 2017/18 growing season, and two (December & February) in the 2018/19 growing season. For 12 replicates consisting of 5 vines each, a 30‐leaf sample was taken for FT‐NIRS and elemental analysis on dried, ground leaf samples. In addition, measurements with a portable FT‐NIRS were taken on fresh leaf samples (2018/19). All measurements were correlated with leaf N concentration (%) determined via elemental analysis. Results : The reliability of the proximal sensors to predict vine N content was dependent on the vine variety and sampling time. FT‐NIRS demonstrated a strong ability to predict vine N concentration independent of season, sampling time and variety. The benchtop FT‐NIRS showed the strongest predictability over both seasons ( r 2 = 0.94), yet the portable FT‐NIRS also showed potential ( r 2 = 0.76). Conclusion : Further investigation of portable FT‐NIRS technology is necessary to provide a robust model for non‐destructive vine N determination in the field.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom