z-logo
Premium
Impact of urease and nitrification inhibitor on NH 4 + and NO 3 − dynamic in soil after urea spring application under field conditions evaluated by soil extraction and soil solution sampling
Author(s) -
Kirschke Tobias,
Spott Oliver,
Vetterlein Doris
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of plant nutrition and soil science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.644
H-Index - 87
eISSN - 1522-2624
pISSN - 1436-8730
DOI - 10.1002/jpln.201800513
Subject(s) - nitrification , urease , urea , chemistry , spring (device) , nitrogen , physics , biochemistry , organic chemistry , thermodynamics
The application of mineral nitrogen (N) fertilizers is one of the most important management tools to ensure and increase yield in agricultural systems. However, N fertilization can lead to various ecological problems such as nitrate (NO 3-) leaching or ammonia and nitrous oxide emissions. The application of N stabilizers ( i.e ., inhibitors) combined with urea fertilization offers an effective option to reduce or even prevent N losses due to their regulatory effect on ammonium (NH 4+) andNO 3-release into the soil. The present field experiment therefore aimed at soil N speciation dynamics after urea spring fertilization (225 kg N ha −1 ) in the presence of a urease inhibitor (UI), a nitrification inhibitor (NI), both inhibitors (UI+NI) or when no inhibitor was applied at all. The study focused on the distribution of N species among soil matrix and soil solution. Plant cultivation was completely omitted in order to avoid masking soil N turnover and speciation by plant N uptake and growth dynamics. Application of UI clearly delayed urea hydrolysis in the top soil, but a complete hydrolysis of urea took place within only 10 days after fertilization (DAF). Nitrification was significantly reduced by NI application, leading to higherNH 4+- N and lowerNO 3-- N concentrations in treatments with NI. Due to sorption ofNH 4+to the soil matrix a significantly larger fraction ofNH 4+was always detected in the soil extracts compared to soil solution. However, while in soil extracts the impact of NI application was less apparent and delayed, in soil solution a quick response to NI application was observed as revealed by significantly increased soil solution concentrations ofNH 4+. Because of the “asymmetric” soil phase distribution soil solutionNH 4+was predominant overNO 3-only initially after fertilization even in inhibitor treatments (≈ 8 to 10 DAF). Nevertheless, inhibitor application tended towards closer ratios ofNH 4+toNO 3-concentration in soil solution and hence, might additionally affect concentration dependent processes like plant N uptake and root development. Despite cold spring conditions urea application along with UI and/or NI did not indicate a limited supply of plant availableNH 4+andNO 3-.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom