z-logo
Premium
Effects of ZnSO 4 and Zn‐EDTA applied by broadcasting or by banding on soil Zn fractions and Zn uptake by wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) under greenhouse conditions
Author(s) -
Zhao Aiqing,
Yang Shu,
Wang Bini,
Tian Xiaohong
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of plant nutrition and soil science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.644
H-Index - 87
eISSN - 1522-2624
pISSN - 1436-8730
DOI - 10.1002/jpln.201800341
Subject(s) - biofortification , zinc , chemistry , bioavailability , agronomy , sowing , fertilizer , environmental chemistry , biology , bioinformatics , organic chemistry
Zinc biofortification of staple food crops is essential for alleviating worldwide human malnutrition. Agronomic interventions to promote this should include fertilizer selection and management. A chelated Zn source, Zn‐EDTA, and an inorganic Zn source, ZnSO 4 × 7 H 2 O, were applied either by banding or by broadcasting in soil, and Zn fractions in soil and Zn uptake by wheat were determined in a pot experiment. Compared to ZnSO 4 × 7 H 2 O, Zn‐EDTA produced higher Zn concentration in grain regardless of application method and even at a lower application rate. Residual Zn fraction was the largest Zn fraction with both ZnSO 4 and Zn‐EDTA amendment. ZnSO 4 banded in soil caused Zn fractions to be restricted to the Zn‐amended soil band and resulted in lower grain Zn concentrations than did broadcast ZnSO 4 . Planting wheat slowed Zn fixation by promoting the maintenance of a high concentration of Zn fraction loosely bound to organic matter (LOM‐Zn) in soil. Zn‐EDTA was a better Zn source for Zn biofortification of wheat than was ZnSO 4 .

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom