Premium
The composition of mobile matter in a floodplain topsoil: A comparative study with soil columns and field lysimeters
Author(s) -
Fritzsche Andreas,
Pagels Britt,
Totsche Kai U.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of plant nutrition and soil science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.644
H-Index - 87
eISSN - 1522-2624
pISSN - 1436-8730
DOI - 10.1002/jpln.201500169
Subject(s) - anoxic waters , lysimeter , topsoil , nitrate , organic matter , environmental science , soil water , environmental chemistry , biogeochemical cycle , soil horizon , hydrology (agriculture) , geology , soil science , chemistry , geotechnical engineering , organic chemistry
Floodplain soils are characterized by frequent and extreme redox changes caused by inundation with river water or imbibition of groundwater. Depending on the duration and extent of inundation, biogeochemical processes run at sub‐/anoxic conditions, which may result in the mobilization and relocation of dissolved and particulate matter within the soil. In this study, we investigated the effect of inundation events on the composition of mobilized matter in the topsoil horizon of a floodplain soil. We conducted experiments with soil columns in the laboratory and gravitational lysimeters in the field to identify redox‐mediated (im)mobilization processes and to estimate their relevance under field conditions. The lysimeters were filled with topsoil monoliths and run under in situ conditions during a ≈ 2.5‐y period. The soil columns were run with the same soil material either under strictly anoxic or mixed oxic–anoxic conditions. Effluents from mixed oxic–anoxic soil were composed fundamentally different [comparably high: Mn, Al, nitrate, sulfate; comparably low: pH, organic C (OC); not detected: Fe, As] compared to effluents from strictly anoxic soil (comparably high: pH, Fe, Mn, OC, As; comparably low: Al; not detected: nitrate, sulfate). Matter, which was mobile under anoxic conditions ( e.g. , Fe, As, OC), was effectively immobilized as soon as the mobile phase passed anoxic–oxic boundaries within soil (exception: Mn). We assume that the solution in the soil monoliths always passed such anoxic–oxic boundaries during downwards migration independent of lysimeter flooding with river water. This is indicated by the similar composition of the lysimeter seepage water and the effluents from mixed oxic–anoxic soil columns. Both solutions contained “fingerprints” from anoxic (Mn) and oxic conditions (nitrate). Inundations with river water and the duration of these floods (1–22 d) did not affect the composition of the lysimeter seepage water. In conclusion, immediate changes in the composition of the solution, which enters either the subsoil or nearby receiving waters, cannot be expected from regular topsoil flooding.