z-logo
Premium
Phosphorus efficiency of ornamental plants in peat substrates
Author(s) -
KhandanMirkohi Azizollah,
Schenk Manfred K.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
journal of plant nutrition and soil science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.644
H-Index - 87
eISSN - 1522-2624
pISSN - 1436-8730
DOI - 10.1002/jpln.200700360
Subject(s) - poinsettia , tagetes , ornamental plant , shoot , sowing , peat , phosphorus , horticulture , chemistry , nutrient , fertigation , dry matter , agronomy , botany , biology , ecology , organic chemistry , inflorescence , bract
A pot experiment was conducted to investigate factors contributing to phosphorous (P) efficiency of ornamental plants. Marigold ( Tagetes patula ) and poinsettia ( Euphorbia pulcherima ) were cultivated in a peat substrate (black peat 80% + mineral component 20% on a volume basis), treated with P rates of 0, 10, 35, 100, and 170 mg (L substrate) –1 . During the cultivation period, plants were fertigated with a complete nutrient solution (including 18 mg P L –1 ) every 2 d. Both poinsettia and marigold attained their optimum yield at the rate of 35 mg P (L substrate) –1 and the critical level of P in shoot dry matter of both crops was 5–6 mg g –1 . After planting, plant‐available P increased at lower P rates to a higher level for poinsettia than for marigold, but no significant change was observed at higher P rates. Balance sheet calculations indicated that at lower P rates more P was fertigated than was taken up by the plants. Root‐length density, root‐to‐shoot ratio, and root‐hair length of marigold were doubled compared to that of poinsettia. Root‐length density increased with crop growth, and 10 d after planting the mean half distance between roots exceeded the P‐depletion zone around roots by a factor of 3 and 1.5 for poinsettia and marigold, respectively. Thus, at this early stage poinsettia exploited only 10% of the substrate volume whereas marigold utilized 43%. Later in the cultivation period, the depletion zones around roots overlapped for both crops. Taking into account P uptake via root hairs, the simulation revealed that this was more important for marigold compared to poinsettia especially at low P‐supply levels. However, increase of P uptake due to root hairs was only 10%–20% at optimum P supply. For the two lower P levels, the P‐depletion profile around roots calculated for 10 d after planting showed that after 2 d of depletion the concentration at the root surface was below the assumed K m value (5 μM) and the concentration gradient was insufficient to fit the demand. A higher content of plant‐available P in the substrate was observed for poinsettia compared to marigold in the treatment with P application adequate for optimum growth, because more fertigated P was accumulated during early stages of cultivation due to lower root‐length density of poinsettia. The observed difference of root morphological parameters did not contribute significantly to P‐uptake efficiency, since P mobility in the peat substrate was high.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here